Listen to the commentaries on the problems surrounding the nuclear plant Fukushima Daiichi. There is a disguised philosophic debate here–the cryptic nature of it adding some unintentional comedy. The Cartesian engineer remains convinced in the ability for instrumental reason to master something as complicated as nuclear power. If somehow all our foresight fails, we simply need to think a little harder or hire a bit smarter of engineers. On the other side are those (like myself) who do not believe that it is ever possible to make technology foolproof, and that attempts to think such matters through create a catch 22: ever more complex attempts to plan for every potentiality themselves make unanticipated failures more likely. It is thus it is foolish to build machines whose downside, no matter how unlikely, are so catastrophic.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Fracking policy | jbrittholbrook on Interior Proposes New Rules for Fracking on U.S. Land – NYTimes.com
- A call for the philosopher librarian | jbrittholbrook on A Primer on Field Philosophy
- Why study philosophy? | jbrittholbrook on Why study philosophy?
- What does it take to be ‘liked’ by scientists? | jbrittholbrook on What Representative Lamar Smith Is Really Trying to Do at NSF – ScienceInsider
- Communities of Integration Workshop – Field Philosophy | csid | jbrittholbrook on Communities of Integration Workshop – Field Philosophy
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
Categories
- Accountability
- Basic News
- Broader Impacts
- Calls for papers
- Climate Change
- Conferences Upcoming
- Convergence
- Creative & Visual Science
- CSID Publications
- Degrowth Economics
- Economics & STEM Research
- Environmental policy
- Future of the University
- Gas Fracking
- Globalization
- Graduate Studies
- Innovation
- institutionalizing interdisciplinarity
- Interdisciplinarity
- Libraries
- Metrics
- Multidisciplinarity
- NASA
- New Books
- New Lexicon
- NIH
- NOAA
- NSF
- Occupy Wall Street
- Open Access
- Peer Review
- Philosophy & Politics
- Public Pedagogy
- Public Philosophizing
- Science and technology ramifications
- STEM Policy
- Sustainability, Risk Management, & Long-Term Security
- TechnoScience & Technoscientism
- Transdisciplinarity
- Transformative Research
- Uncategorized
- US Science Agencies
Meta